Dataset·July 21, 2026·2 min read

What professional ad design looks like: 35 on-brief creatives

An open dataset of 35 finished social ad creatives, one for each of 35 synthetic brands across 4 industries, designed in Figma by professionals from the Contra network working from simulated client briefs.

Contra Labs
Contra Labs
July 21, 2026 · 2 min read

What does a professionally designed ad actually look like, across brands and industries? This dataset holds 35 finished ad creatives, one for each of 35 unique, synthetic brands across 4 industries, e-commerce/retail, food and beverage, beauty/wellness, and tech, all delivered as social ads. We gave designers from the Contra network a simulated client brief for each brand, including:

  1. Company name
  2. Brand guidelines
  3. Logo
  4. Product image

From there, we asked creative professionals to create a final, on-brand square ad that a brand would actually post to a social feed. Designs were created in Figma, incorporating all brand guideline features and inputs.

The published dataset is the brand input and final output. Every brand is represented once, so the set spans 35 distinct brand identities and use cases, distributed across e-commerce/retail, food and beverage, beauty/wellness, and tech brands

The range of visual conventions, including product-forward retail layouts, appetite-driven food imagery, clean beauty aesthetics, and information-dense tech messaging represents the range of ad creative being commissioned by real companies to be created by real designers. This structure makes the data directly usable in several training contexts:

  • Text-to-image fine-tuning: a curated corpus of real, on-brief square ad creatives for conditioning image models on professional layout, type, and brand style
  • Layout & text-in-image generation: real examples of type hierarchy, logo placement, and copy integration
  • Benchmarking & evals: a human-designed reference set for measuring generated ads against professional output, by industry

The dataset is released under the CC BY 4.0 license on Hugging Face.

Continue reading3 studies
All research
  1. July 16, 2026Research
    Where four AI models break when they build a landing page8 designers annotated 40 pages from GPT 5.6 Sol, Claude Fable 5, Grok 4.5, and Muse Spark 1.1, marking 754 failure points across 8 tags. Every model broke differently.Read
  2. July 16, 2026Benchmark
    GPT Image 2 won 41.9% of logo tournaments, and still only half its logos were client-ready10 brand designers judged GPT Image 2, Nano Banana Pro, MAI Image 2.5, and Meta Muse across 12 logo briefs. The winner is clear, and still only half its logos cleared the client bar.Read
  3. July 15, 2026Dataset
    How professional editors work: 234 annotated Premiere stepsA preview dataset of 234 annotated steps across 4 computer-use trajectories, recorded as professional editors built vertical social reels in Adobe Premiere Pro.Read